Showing posts with label sir gawain and the green knight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sir gawain and the green knight. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Odd Things I Was Told About Sir Gawain and the Green Knight That Have Somehow Stuck With Me

by J J Cohen

As a wee graduate student I took an independent study on Middle English romances with Larry Benson. Because this was back in the Olden Days, Benson was allowed to smoke furiously as he expostulated on all manner of topics, some of them actually related to romances composed in Middle English. Chris Cannon and I would feed him the occasional question, but mostly we just watched his performance unfold. A highlight: Benson would often place his cigarette in his mouth backwards, and we had a running bet on whether he would ever light it in that position. He never did, but he often came perilously close.

I will someday die of cancer from all that secondhand nicotine nebulosity. I did, however, learn quite a bit about Middle English romances and assorted contingent topics.

Here are two "facts" absorbed in that smoky study, facts that have stuck with me for reasons I still cannot discern. I have no reason to believe that either is true, and yet ...
  1. A scholarly article was once composed arguing that when the Green Knight's head is lopped off by Gawain and rolls around the floor, kicked by the various knights of the Arthurian court, we have the first literary attestation of the game that becomes football.
  2. A famous Arthurian scholar argued that the proof of the romance's utter Englishness could be found in the scene where Lady Bertilak, intent on seducing a slumbering Gawain, enters his room and -- in the dead of winter -- throws open his window. Only the English (this scholar proclaimed) are so insanely climate immune.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Sir Gawain and the Green Knight: Why the Two Holes?

by Karl Steel

Yesterday my Comp Lit course finished up Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Among other things, I stressed the unresolved hybridities of the "Chapel" in Fitt IV: its combination of natural and architecture features, the hole in the hill as a sanctified hermit hole (I reminded them of the cave at the end of Hartmann von Aue's Gregorius) and as otherworldly entrance, Hautdesert as the "desert" of the wild Welsh wilderness and as the "desert" as the place of the saints, the green sash on Gawain himself as binding him to the natural world of the Green Knight (and Morgan) and to the culture of textiles and clothing, &c &c. You know the drill.

And then I opened it to questions, and a student, always a careful reader, asked [not an exact quote]: "Why two holes? Do otherworldly entrances normally have two entrances, or an entrance and an exit?" The line she meant is SGGK IV.2180:
Hit [the chapel mound] hade a hole on þe ende and on ayþer syde,
(It had a hole at one end, and there was one at the other)
My response? "The otherworldly entrances I know have only the one hole, so I don't know.....I'll ask an expert." By expert I mean you. Any suggestions?

Friday, August 31, 2007

First Week, First Stories

I've just finished my first week at Brooklyn College, where I'm teaching The Emergence of the Modern,* The Bible as Literature, and Medieval English Literature (which I'm of course doing as Medieval British Literature: no one can keep me from Marie de France, Gerald of Wales, and Beroul). I'm really loving it. We did Fitt I of SGGK (not this), after an overlong 'intro to the Middle Ages' lecture (do you find that you lecture longer with or without notes? For me, I think it's "without"). where I focused, naturally, on the opening Trojan lines, the humiliation of Arthur's court, and the Green Knight himself. I imagine this is probably the standard SGGK class?

I walked them through order of presentation for the GK: his perfect (too perfect) body [I said it "went to 11": no laughs. Can I no longer make Spinal Tap references in my lectures?]), his perfect clothing (after having introduced them 30 minutes beforehand to the 1363 sumptuary law: bless them, they made the connection), and then, but only then, his shagginess. The red eyes of course come much later. I asked: why hold off on his monstrousness for so long?

And 25 minutes later, I had run out of time. Good! And I got at least one golden comment from my students: "I have to keep reminding myself he's a monster." I just about jumped on my desk; instead, I held myself to gesturing wildly at her, nearly shouting "Precisely!," and then, more calmly, "Why do you suppose that is? What happens when something occupies the place where a monster should go but isn't in fact that monstrous?"

I expect many people here have finished their first week of teaching. Consider this a low-stakes conversational thread to share your own perfect pedagogical moments, places where a class has surprised you (for the good), and where you've been reminded of why you're in the profession at all. Join in especially if this is your first time teaching.


* I didn't come up with the title. It's a "Core" course, in this case, an Intro to Western Lit Course, Chaucer to Woolf, with 1001 Nights standing in for 'the rest of the world.' I've been teaching it as "The Emergence of the Modern?" (Aren't I clever? I started with 'The Former Age,' so you can see how this class will go).

Friday, February 09, 2007

"captures some answering bright gleam in their own souls"

Check out Adam Roberts, "Undressing Gawain," at The Valve -- the SGGK piece he spoke of here: an errant meditation on clothing in the poem, with lots on beauty and the allure of medieval shiny objects .... and some speculation on the temporal cross-dressing that draws moderns to the medieval.

Monday, February 05, 2007

Sir Gawain and the Shivering Birds


For the many readers -- -- OK, for the ONE reader -- who requested something on Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, I offer the following snippet, part of an essay in a forthcoming edited collection on Nature in the Middle Ages. Unfortunately I've had so much trouble with the thorns, eths and yoghs that I had to strip out the Old and Middle English. The excerpt seems especially apt, given that is currently 19 degrees in Washington -- freakishly cold, by our standards (What do you make of this inconvenient little truth, Al Gore? Let those glacierless polar bears move here.)

----------

Not every animal is a human in a beast's body, even when it is being deployed as a meditation on the burdens of human identity.

In the Old English poem "The Wanderer," the forlorn narrator voices his isolation through the bodies of birds. In their obliviousness to his plight, these marine fowl demonstrate how the world has quite literally become cold to him. Ice and snow engulf a seascape where gulls perform their animal rituals, oblivious to the friendless exile in their midst. Later in the poem frigidity deepens into animus as the encroaching dark hurls tempests against humankind ("night-shadow darkens, from the north sends bitter hailstorms, with enmity against men" 104-5).

Similar moments occur in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. Of the surviving Middle English poems, this is the work most obsessed with interweaving nature into its human narratives, not just in the famous hunt scenes, but throughout the unfolding action and in the smallest details. Even the Green Knight is decorated with holly. Every action undertaken by Gawain, every emotion experienced by this knight, has some counterpart in the animal-rich landscapes across which the poem unfolds. Gawain's departure from the Arthurian court culminates a kaleidoscopic change of seasons, a sinuous movement from bright spring to cheerful summer to grey winter. Sir Gawain moves through a world saturated with desire. Bright summer's advent finds the world ardent for life, and vegetation stirs with yearning: "When the dew at dawn drops from the leaves, / To get a gracious glance from the golden sun" (519-20). The faded austerity of winter follows, as "wroth winds in the welkin wrestle with the sun" and the green grass grows grey (525-27), a universe of change and motion.

Gawain, winter cold within his soul, gloomily sets forth from Camelot to discover the habitation of the Green Knight. The nadir of his journey finds him wandering a Welsh wasteland, miserably alone. We know the knight's psychic turmoil not because he voices it like the Wanderer, but because his emotions are the landscape. His gloom is an arboreal tangle, his despondency an animal lament:
By a mountain next morning he makes his way
Into a forest fastness, fearsome and wild;
High hills on either hand, with hoar woods below,
Oaks old and huge by the hundred together,
The hazel and the hawthorn were all intertwined
With rough raveled moss, that raggedly hung,
With many birds unblithe upon bare twigs
That peeped most piteously for pain of the cold. (740-47)

His mind as crowded with foreboding thoughts as an ancient forest, Gawain wanders a terrain that at once seems too full (trees by the hundreds) and too bare (winter has stripped everything, invading the whole of the world with its chill). The knight from Camelot knows that time to accomplish his quest is trickling away while he remains "mon al hym one" ("a man all alone" 749). His misery is embodied in those "mony bryddez vnblythe ...that pitosly piped for pyne of the colde." In a wordless avian complaint, Gawain's pangs at his solitude find their most lyrical expression

... [skip to a longish section on animals as bodies resistant to historicist readings] ...

Derrida's l'animot, Lingis's oceanic humanity, Haraway's companion species: all function as an invitation to explore a spacious corporeality beyond the specious boundaries of the human, to invent through alliances with possible bodies a monstrous kind of becoming that carries history within but which is not reducible to historical allegory, cannot in the end be sorted for its use value. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight features a protagonist's movement across similarly animated geographies. In that somber errantry we can see not just an instance of the pathetic fallacy, where anthropocentrism leads a human author to glean nothing but human meanings from a non-human landscape, but what the philosopher Gail Weiss has called "embodiment as intercorporeality," can see the ways in which our very identities are dispersed across the relations we form. Even better, this vegetal and animal dispersedness could be termed an interspecies alliance, the mode by which a knight of the Arthurian Court can share his sorrow at the world's chill with birds who huddle in winter misery. These animals give voice to their sadness in a language that, while not human, is also not so very difficult to understand:
The hazel and the hawthorn were all intertwined
With rough raveled moss, that raggedly hung,
With many bords unblithe upon bare twigs
That peeped most piteously for pain of the cold.
The good knight on Gringolet glides thereunder
Through many a marsh, a man all alone.(744-49)

We know already that this last line must be untrue. Despite what at first glance appears to be his somber solitariness, Gawain's subjectivity is entangled in hazel and hawthorn, his embodiment completed by shivering birds, his knightly identity inseparable from his good steed Gringolet.

Sir Gawain glides through a world alive with flora and fauna, a world where he can never be "a man all alone."

----
UPDATE: I realize in retrospect that I posted a bit of this essay already, here. My excuse is that the frost benumbed my synapses. Besides, since I started this post by invoking the inconvenient Al Gore, why not take his ecopassion to heart and recycle? I'm sure that I am somehow reducing the planetary carbon emission total in doing so.